She Lost Against the Seller. Her Case Against Her Own Agent Goes On.
Your buyer moves in. A week later, they call about something they noticed: a smell, a stain, a worn spot. Their first thought is usually the seller. A California appeals case from this year is a reminder that the questions don't always stop with the other side of the deal.
What the court looked at
In an unpublished opinion this year, a California Court of Appeal looked at a Los Angeles condo purchase. According to the opinion, the buyer found after buying that the unit smelled of cigarette smoke.
She lost an arbitration against the seller and the seller's broker over the disclosure, then sued her own broker, alleging he failed to discover and disclose the odor. The trial court threw the case out, saying the arbitration result blocked it.
The Court of Appeal reversed in part: the arbitration didn't bar her claims against her own broker. These are allegations; the court didn't decide whether the broker did anything wrong.
One more note: the opinion is unpublished. Under California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115, it can't be cited as precedent, so we're sharing it as a real-world example, not as a rule.
Why this one is worth a second look
Details a buyer notices at showings are worth asking about before closing. Agents on both sides have their own duties, and in this case, a win against the other side didn't settle the questions about the buyer's own agent.
It's easy to assume that if the seller's side handled the disclosures, the file is covered. In this case, the buyer's claims against her own broker went forward even after she lost against the seller.
A quick check before your client removes contingencies
Before contingencies come off, it helps to compare what your client saw and noticed at showings with what the disclosures and reports actually say. Is there anything your client mentioned in passing that never made it into a question? Anything a disclosure answers in a way that doesn't match what everyone noticed in the unit?
These aren't legal questions. They're plain-English questions a careful second read can raise. We flag inconsistencies and red flags early, so questions can go to the right professional.
What's at stake
Missed details can turn into disputes after closing. In this case, the dispute went through arbitration, a lawsuit and an appeal, and the questions about the buyer's own agent are still open. Most clients would much rather understand the paperwork up front.
How House Owl helps
We understand how overwhelming the paperwork is. You're the one guiding your client through it. House Owl is a second set of eyes on your disclosures and transaction documents, so questions get caught and referred before close.
A simple plan for your next escrow
1. Book a free 30-minute Learn More call.
2. We review your disclosures and transaction documents for inconsistencies and red flags.
3. We walk your client through what we found on a recorded Zoom call, and you're invited to join, so they can close with more confidence.
An independent second read of your disclosures and transaction documents, with the walkthrough saved as a video recording. We can send a quick recap after the review, and if something needs your attention, we reach out to you directly.
Jason Piske has worked in California real estate since 2016 and offers disclosure-risk training to brokerages. The fee is $995 per side, paid at close of escrow, with nothing up front. You can see how it works on our Services page and get quick answers in our FAQ. Payment terms are in our Terms.
Close with more confidence
Clients who understand their documents before they sign. That's the outcome worth working toward on every file.
A second set of eyes on your disclosures.
For more information, book a free 30-minute Learn More call.
Sources
General information, not legal advice. House Owl is an independent document review service, not a law firm, real estate brokerage or home inspector. Owner Jason Piske is a California real estate licensee (DRE 02004501), but in a House Owl review he doesn't act as anyone's agent or represent any party.
Comments